16
Jul
2010
Posted by Charles Heflin as Social Media
I know I post a lot about the need for businesses to get involved in social media. Hell, it’s half (actually more like all) of my business to get companies involved in social media. That’s why I put Social Media Science together with Tom to create SYNND. Just because I want businesses to get involved in social media and realize the power behind it however… doesn’t mean that it’s going to work for everyone. It also doesn’t mean that everyone can do it.
It’s not like Geico.
Granted I’m not talking about the physiology of the human body. We’re not talking about acid-base as it related to pH balance. We’re not mixing rocket fuel. This is easy stuff. You can get by posting to your Facebook profile without a psych major. You can probably write a 550 word blog post rant about people who cut across the Walmart parking lot doing 40mph instead of using the lanes (I loathe that…) and manage it without a literature degree.
You obviously don’t need a production team to post a video of a customer who won’t stop bragging about you.
There’s that remote possibility that you’re the type of person who stares at a blank sheet of paper or the blinking cursor and wonders if you may be more productive had you not done…all those things in high school you did. Maybe you just hate writing, or perhaps there’s a part of you that thinks dancing in front of a camera for YouTube sounds like something you just.. can’t bring yourself to do.
Maybe both.
The fact is, social media is about engagement and content, and because content drives the web you’re pretty much forced to do one or the other. Granted theirs audio, but you can’t really run an “audio” campaign. You’ve got to supplement it with more. From a business standpoint, social media seems like the insurmountable barrier for a lot of business owners who have this mindset.
Personally, I think that sucks. And I say that coming from a position of total empathy.
The fact is, there are a lot of business owners that are concerned about the amount of time they can put into social media and whether or not they’re even capable of doing it themselves. Keep in mind my self-employed friends, you do have the opportunity to have someone else handle and maintain your web presence.
So what are you overall options as a business owner?
You - Yeah we pretty much ruled that out. That one is skunked. It’s the logical choice but there is obviously something holding you back whether it’s skill, time, fear, stubbornness, etc. So lets just move right along.
An Employee - The next logical choice but you have to consider a few things. The time you need to allot for that employee to manage the web presence. Do they have the knowledge of social media? Are they skilled and talented enough to create the content you need? Can they act in an unbiased manner instead of lashing out irrationally with responses like “I dO nOt hAvE A ComFortaBle LiFe!” on your Facebook wall? Some companies have employees that make the cut, many simply don’t.
Random Family - As good as their intentions usually are, we all know from many years of broken deals, heartache and horse-trading that getting family involved in business just… well I’ll just say that the drawbacks are not only numerous, but painful to think about. The end result is usually bad. Not like “oooooh no I got a flat tire” bad. More like “four horsemen of the apocalypse” bad.
Professional Agency/Freelance/Outside Contractor - If you’ve got the budget for this, it’s a great option. There are a lot of companies that will completely monitor your reputation online. They’ll handle all of your social media accounts, write content and market with that content, etc. Budget for businesses is usually the issue but the return with social media marketing is often much higher over time than what gets invested.
Ultimately, you have to make a smart decision about what you’re going to do. It may seem OK to just put a warm body in the seat but as we know from running a business for years, you can’t just hire anyone.
I admit it can be a bit of a catch22. What do you think? If you’re stuck between worry and budget, what’s the best choice if there’s legitimate concern on both sides?
Spread the knowledge ... Re-tweet this content.
Outsource
Your
Marketing
in Minutes
to Hundreds
Worldwide...
Click Here >>>
4 Responses
Hiring a social media strategist is a bad idea | Stand Out Among Millions on the Internet
July 16th, 2010 at 3:46 pm
1[...] The Big Myth – Anyone Can Do Social Media (charlesheflin.com) Tags: Business, internet marketing, Search engine optimization, Social Media Category: General Interest, Social Media You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave a Reply [...]
Elizabeth Adams
July 18th, 2010 at 11:17 am
2Hello, Charles …
Your article — “The Big Myth - Anyone Can Do Social Media” — is a myth, all right. Even 20-year veteran reporters and international news agencies get it wrong sometimes:
“Twitter isn’t big on context, and CNN reporter and editor Octavia Nasr is paying the price. The network is dropping her after she caused an uproar by tweeting ‘respect’ for a notorious Hezbollah figure upon hearing news of his death. Nasr, a 20-year CNN veteran, tried to clarify later that she meant to praise Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah only for his defiance of other Shia clerics on women’s rights, notes the New York Times, but it was too late.” http://bit.ly/aRMzDD
But that’s no reason to go crawl in a hole and pull over the hatch cover!
Instead, it’s the best reason there is to dust off the gamesmanship for which American Business is famous.
Remember General Anthony McAuliffe! When refusing to surrender during the WWII Battle of Bastogne, he said, “Us surrender? Aw, nuts!” http://bit.ly/d1uGNB
When soldiers are surrounded and defending an objective, one option they have is the “breakout.”
The rule is, when you’re out on the battlefield and you don’t know what to do, do something — anything — because if you don’t, you’re dead.
American Business used to be able to “win” with direct, interruptive-type advertising, but the effectiveness of that approach is rapidly dwindling.
It is now the indirect approach which must be mastered.
And *monitored* … as CNN has found to its cost.
The basic principle involved here is this:
Don’t make enemies for free!
warmest regards …
Elizabeth
Charles Heflin
July 19th, 2010 at 9:20 am
3Hi Elizabeth,
Thank you for the thoughtful comment… I agree 140 characters is not enough room to establish context, intent or avoid making “broad” sweeping statements that can be misunderstood and misconstrued… This and many other factors are leading me to believe that Twitter will implode upon itself once people realize A) nobody’s “really” listening or B) It’s just plain dangerous (as you indicated above) and C) people will get tired of “tweeting” when they realize it’s a “time suck”… Twitter will remain useful for certain purposes but the broad base user-ship happening now will experience a sharp decline IMO.
Zahn
July 26th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
4I am all for myth busting, and thanks for the thoughts on SM. I new to your blog and am looking forward to getting your perspective on the “best practices” of marketing, or how one uses their time most wisely in starting their new business on line. Thanks for sharing useful thoughts on Social Media.
Zahn
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: Small Businesses Are Drowning Among Lifeboats.
next post: For The Wavering Value Of The Buck – Pay With A Tweet
to top of page...