03
Sep
2008
Posted by Charles Heflin as social media marketing

And boy did he leave a big footprint!
As a matter of fact he’s leaving footprints all over the place and Google is hot on his trail…
Bigfoot needs to come back to his own and become invisible again, blend back in with the forest or he’s going to become the subject of a scientific experiment… What am I talking about?
If your sole reason for using social media websites or social bookmarking websites is to build links to enhance the rankings of your own web properties then you could be in for a nice spanking from Google and you are probably seeing ZERO results from Yahoo! and MSN.
Google is famous for allowing people to game their system (for a while) and then come down with an elbow off the top rope leaving you buried under the mat. Why does Google do this?
Because they need time to research, explore, document, theorize, whiteboard present, calculate and ultimately dominate… That’s right, Google will let you rise to the top for a while just so they can plan your take-down (and everyone else like you).
Google has its eyes set on social networks… They have some tricks up their sleeve that I will be talking about soon that will morph the Internet into a new era. They are watching to see how people “game” social media websites for the sake of increased search engine rankings.
We have noticed how much of a (huge) footprint that this type of activity leaves behind and how easily Google could slap you through the floor “when” they spot it.
Here is a list of actions that leave big footprints…
These are some of the easiest to spot footprints, there are many others… Are you leaving any footprints?
The term social media and the word marketing placed together automatically leads people down the wrong path. There are many ways to market yourself in social media but using social media in a non social way (as a way to increase the link love) often leaves footprints that are easy to trace back to the source.
Here’s an example (notice all the backlinks to the site are from social platforms)
The site above used to rank in the top 5 for the term “buy nintendo wii” … we’ve been watching it (we don’t know who they are) … we’ve just been intrigued by how it moves all over the search engine results pages as Google rotates their data centers and algorithms.
Whoever owns this website is leaving a big, ugly, unnatural footprint behind. I am sure they have been making good money because they have ranked very highly between March 2008 and June 2008 for a money term. This is “proof” that you can gain high search engine rankings by creating inbound links to your website using social media but how long will it last? Their effort is already dwindling … Instead of top 5 rankings they have started sinking like a rock.
How many hours of work was put into this effort?
All this work and effort will eventually be scrapped, useless as Google seeks to remove all traces of this kind of activity. The hours of effort will ultimately have to be repeated through another endeavor. No asset is built.
In order to understand how to effectively use social media you have to put the word marketing out of your mind initially. This is not a system that can be “gamed” on a long-term ongoing basis. If you like rebuilding your business over and over again then go ahead but I like knowing that the effort I put into my business today will continue to be effective two years from now. The time I spend working today is time spent building an asset… Are you building an asset online or are you just sampling the flavor of the week?
You can use social media to build a powerful online presence, enjoy high search engine visibility, achieve trust from your industry and build a highly profitable business. You can build a business where you don’t have to go back to the drawing board over and over again. You can build a business that grows and compounds over time … A real asset.
It all comes down to you and what you are focused on. If you are focused on money then you have a long road to haul. If you are focused on providing a product or service to people (who have money) then money will come to you naturally while you build a real asset. Build true fans and you never have to worry about the money.
The impending Google shift is going to weed Bigfoot out of the crowd … They are building the largest human policed system in existence… Their employees will be … everyone … this will be the single most brilliant move that Google has made to date in weeding out spam and delivering “human voted best” content… It’s coming, are you prepared?
The moral of the story is this … Build a “real” business now or you will be squeezed out by Google and everyone else.
This post has been part 4 in the “social action series” I am writing that is devoted to teaching the effective use of social media to achieve “marketing” results. How have you been using social networks? Are you building a long term business or are you after short term results?
Here are the previous posts that have led to this one:
In the next post in this series I will be talking about the single thing that will ensure your success in social media … If you do it right.
Learn how to apply Social Media and SEO 2.0 to your business click here.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You may also follow my updates on Twitter.
82 Responses
Social Bookmarking Tips - Thirty Day Challenge Forums
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:59 am
1[...] bookmarking. Google is watching suspicious book marking patterns and that can affect your ranking. * I spotted Bigfoot on your website doing social marketing*by*Charles Heflin __________________ [...]
Mike Rogers
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:17 pm
2Bigfoot Wears Shoes???!!!
lol
But you are exactly right, Charles. Its far, far better not to use ANY method for getting back links or driving traffic unless you are thoroughly familiar with the possible consequences of getting it wrong.
Excellent post.
Mike
Tony Murphy
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:38 pm
3Hi Charles,
I think you are absolutely right that Google will come down heavy on social marketing tactics. However I think that a solid combination of SEO and Social marketing is a good approach that will avoid a dependency on Google or just Social Marketing. Getting the right balance is the hard part but right now I am certainly not depending on the biggest advertising company in the world for my web traffic
cheers
Tony
Sid
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:41 pm
4Hi Charles,
Another great article. Yes, Google has a habit of sitting back and seeing how people will take advantage of a new phenomenon on the web. In the end it always comes back to slow and steady wins the race, doesn’t it?
Thanks,
Sid
Sandy North
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:42 pm
5Charles, I can see where this is going — article marketing will become useless as well, won’t it, if things continue along this path? I’m trying to think ahead here. How will one get a site off the ground in the future, getting some backlinks, if Google closes off all the good methods?
CrustyAdmin
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:23 pm
6I blogged on this very thing last Saturday. The party is almost over, I believe. It’s like musical chairs only this time all the chairs are getting pulled out.
I say GOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mike
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:39 pm
7Interesting,
Having researched and tested every known advertising medium known to the industry, one think for certain, this is a moving target, and a sinking one at that. What worked yesterday doesn’t work today, and with constant Google changes, it is nearly a full time job staying up on latest SEO strategies.
Given Google is going in every direction possible, helter skelter to boost revenues, I think they see the problem just as we have over the past year. Recession is obviously part of problem, but let us look a little deeper. Ask yourself, do you really click on PPC Adwords anymore? I don’t know about you, but I only click on natural search engine listings which are on top, certainly not the sponsored ads which are all second rate offers, so it is time to wake up, PPC is on a decline, just as I have seen in my revenues, half what it was a year ago, and 33% more traffic, so the saturation of PPC ads has finally hit Google and others, so they are all scrambling, why else would Google come out with Chrome browser?
Simply put, if you want to increase your business sales, take a step back and use what I call back to basics, with a high tech twist. Take a look at predictive auto dialer software if you want more sales than you can handle, it happened to me, and I had used auto dialers a decade ago, and knew they worked, but with the DNC issues, in house dialers died. Internet based high tech dialers are so powerful you can call tens of thousands of prospects every hour, hands free. How many sales can you handle? I know I couldn’t handle half for I ran a larger campaign figuring it would work similar to my old dialer system worked. Man, was I wrong, this will blow your socks off.
Take a test drive and check it out, watch video presentation on set up, get on a call, you won’t regret it. PPC is on its way out, bulk email is long since been dead, so look to the past, combined with the future, and you have the answer to recessionproof business tool.
Happy Prospecting, Mike
http://www.RecessionProof-Business.com
Bob
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:45 pm
8Why is it google is hurting the people that use it?
Charles Heflin
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:47 pm
9@Tony Murphy … I agree there will always be a balance between SEO and social media … SEO is morphing into a hybrid where human votes will count similar to backlinks have in the past. The algorithm for spotting “real” activity as opposed to link building will be policed by society at large.
Charles Heflin
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:55 pm
10@Sandy North … That is a good question … All we can do at this point is theorize about the answer …
Here’s mine:
I believe that gaining incoming links will be a matter of providing link worthy content. This is the way it was intended all along. Any system that is designed to subvert actual human driven interest will probably be a short-term strategy.
This will, without question, effect a large number of online businesses that have, for years, used tactics to artificially inflate their search rankings. To these people, Google will be evil.
Charles Heflin
September 3rd, 2008 at 3:05 pm
11@Mike … Thank you for the insightful post … Though I don’t know anything about auto dialers, I agree with your sentiment about PPC saturation… I never click Google ads and think they look trashy on a website or blog.
Recession proof business is what we always seek to build…. I don’t know about auto-dialing software though … seems a little bit off subject from the post and kind of twisted into a promotion for yourself.
the devil's in the details
September 3rd, 2008 at 3:20 pm
12Hi … information to fortune seekers … I suppose without the likes of Google policing the internet life online would be less of a happy informative experience with all the S.E.O and other short cut posting kind of software that has hit the web at very affordable pricing we all would be totally swamped with spam like information … so we all have to think like Google after all there mission statement is … No Evil
All my best to you and good luck with your mission
Phillip Skinner
Anna
September 3rd, 2008 at 3:44 pm
13This is one of the best blog posts I have ever seen. It answered many questions in a few words. And of course new questions come up as well.
It does make me wonder about article marketing, forum marketing, posting on remote blogs, and all of that. It even makes me wonder to a degree about Squidoo pages and Hubs. I suppose that if they are of good quality, backlinks from them should still be useful.
While I can’t see how one would create a successful site with zero promotion, as no one would ever find it to begin with. It might be that they key is a combination of good content and design, with high interactivity in a few social media (as opposed to low activity in a ton of social media.) This would give one time to meet people in one’s niche, make friends, and get the word out about one’s site the right way. Simply commenting on other blogs might be one of the most effective ways to do this.
In fact I sometimes wonder - what if I did almost nothing but blog posting, video promotions, site building, and commenting? With a few social profiles to keep up with on the side. And maybe guest-post swapping. These seem to all be relatively “real” methods of generating traffic, backlinks, and (even better) friends.
I wonder too if article marketing will continue to work. I mean, it does have some very legitimate aspects. If you are an idiot and you publish an idiotic article, it is not going to generate a lot of quality traffic. If you provide useful and informative articles, more people publish them and this gives you more backlinks. So surely this should still be worth some “kudos” in Google’s eyes?
Oh here is another one I wonder about - link exchanges! In some cases it seems quite logical. For example, I have a poetry blog. And poetry blogs tend to exchange links with other poetry blogs, so that they can all comment on eachother’s poetry and refer each other. This seems natural, SEO or no SEO. But if I owned a hotel, would I do link exchanges for my hotel website? So that I could swap traffic with competing hotels in my area?
Anyway these are all just questions that come to mind and maybe thinking ahead with these factors in mind can help us all stay prepared.
Another technique which is seldom spoken about is … visiting Google’s blog! Asking questions on their message boards. Getting it straight from the horse’s mouth where ever possible. I seldom see that as a recommended strategy though I have gotten some good answers from doing that in the past.
Anyway, thanks very much for this post Charles. Honestly, it helped a lot with some questions I was having.
David
September 3rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm
14So all The Gurus “Build a list and sell a crap e-book/course on beating Google” are going to be crying soon…have you an insight as to when this will be happening Charles?
6 weeks?, 6 months?
Thanks for your expert guidance in legitimate long term business.
Charles Heflin
September 3rd, 2008 at 4:57 pm
15@David … There is no way to be sure when this will come to full tilt but evidence points to it being underway … I anticipate Google friend connect to come out of private beta within the next 6 months… It will be interesting to see how that shakes out.
crustyadmin
September 3rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
16“Why is it google is hurting the people that use it?”
On the other hand, Google is protecting the average user by not showing them content of artificially pumped up importance. Which is a good thing, unless your one of the pumpers.
Barry
September 3rd, 2008 at 5:20 pm
17Absolutely ridiculous !!!
If what you are saying is true, all internet commerce would come to a complete halt. Think about it. All the ezine article directories. All the Squidoo’s and Hub pages every venue created online to keep the wheel of IM going would completely disappear. Tell the owners of these big business like EzineArticles that their very reason to exist is about to be extinguished. And if that weren’t enough consider the amount of GAMING that would take place online if user votes were to determine site rank. That one is almost laughable considering the amount of fraud that would take place if a system like this were developed.
There are major corporations involved with giant SEO companies spending literally billions of dollars….where do you think Google gets all their money….that would literally dry up and disappear over night if what you are pushing here were even a half truth.
I can’t imagine a system put in place that would cut Google’s corporate revenues to nothing in no time flat.
Do algorithms change…yes constantly and they are getting smarter but so are SEO tactics as well and always will. The search engine results we are seeing today are a 1000 times better than just a few years ago so I see nothing like what you mention every becoming a reality and causing a complete IM earthquake…not to mention Google would only be inviting other search engine competition to exist to fill the void where there is virtually none right now…..
Hmmmmmmm…….
Barry
Charles Heflin
September 3rd, 2008 at 5:52 pm
18@Barry … I am not pushing anything here… Your take on what I wrote is interesting… I never suggested what you have summized but it is an interesting take
Why would you make this asessment?
What I say here is based on evidence … What you are assuming would come to pass based on my words seems over the top extreme to me… I don’t see how IM would be effected the way you say.
I also never said that human voting would completely replace everything … You injected that on you own.
crustyadmin
September 3rd, 2008 at 5:53 pm
19Barry, that’s interesting, but how would Google suffer if they discount Digg, et al?
Google will still take greenbacks to be at the top of the search listings. Paid search still lives. What dies is artificially inflated rankings for individual sites. How does that hurt anyone, but the site owners. Certainly Google doesn’t get hurt.
SEO will always exist though it could be pushed well beyond the reach of the average internet marketer. So the average person needs to build something people like organically, or shell out $$$ to someone to SEO for them. SEO will become almost exclusively black hat because the algorithm will deal effectively with lesser techniques.
I’ve been wrong before, but certainly you can’t deny that Google keeps improving it’s algorithm.
Johnathon Leger and others will have a three-way linking type of subscription for Social SEO. I’m sure he can’t wait unitil Google cranks things down again. More money in his pocket because the average person can’t hit a couple forums and go on an SEO campaign. If link building worked like it did 5 years ago, what would be th point of a paid three way links system?
Michael Constantinos
September 3rd, 2008 at 6:23 pm
20Charles, you are really inspiring to me and I have thought deeply about your underlying theme of building a quality, stable, and secure business ever since reading your Master Plan.
I believe you are 100% correct and and I feel that doing anything else is futile if the objective is long-term success.
Thank you for the reminder and confirmation that the long way is really the short way.
Barry
September 3rd, 2008 at 7:08 pm
21Hey Charles…Adam…
“I also never said that human voting would completely replace everything … You injected that on you own.”
Well, I could only surmise that by the following statement in your post.
“The impending Google shift is going to weed Bigfoot out of the crowd … They are building the largest human policed system in existence… Their employees will be … everyone … this will be the single most brilliant move that Google has made to date in weeding out spam and delivering “human voted best” content… It’s coming, are you prepared?”
I’m not about to suggest that Google does not do outrageous maneuvers on a variable basis. They love to let all parties concerned know who is in charge. And I am not going to deny Charles, on your linked example, of a completely sloppy social bookmarking attempt by some noob marketer which demostrates how vulnerable doing that type of back linking will only produce huge prints but let’s face it….nearly all the social networking and bookmarking sites only exist by the power of the IM’r
Will Google employ some from of weeding procedure against the example you have produced? I would say more than likely yes but to what degree? Where were these social sites before internet marketers started using their power?
Sure, look at Myspace….and Facebook….very popular in the beginning but to what crowd? Kids…nothing more…nothing less…and there is no revenue in kids space. Have you ever tried using their PPC methods on these sites?…completely useless. Their popularity is now almost exclusively their ability to produce a high PR back link. Millions of accounts are there for that sole purpose….all gone with one fell swoop if Google attempts to undermine that type of market.
Take these types of markets away and about a dozen different forms of revenue will disappear for all the big parties involved including Google. I am not about to buy adspace on any of these sites that are only dominated by people who won’t or can’t buy.
It wasn’t until the IM revolution that took place after the 2006 mega slap Google initiated up the blackhat world that the social networks literally exploded…along with the revenue that got even Google itself to stand up and pay attention.
I know…I made my living exclusively as a black hatter from 2003 to 2006. ( And there different types of so called “black hat” methods by the way that are greatly misunderstood by many. I never once got my IP banned or lost an adsense account or did anything remotely underhanded or illegal.)
I agree and whole heartedly support your idea’s on staying on the cutting edge. I currently build “flakey edge” white hat sites that employ as much black hat as i can possibly get away with and still remain safe and employ every new piece of technology I can get my hands on….that is what it will take..no question about it. Virtually all my sites deliver high quality content and/or products but if I can find a new technique that works…=)
The internet marketing scenario of the last 2 years has produce more high quality info than in all of history…most of it in an attempt produce those “artificially inflated sites.” Artificially inflate your site, produce great content and keep your positions. Without continuing to let that type of market exist would eliminate much of the quality info that Google so proudly eminates as it’s sole reason to exist. If article marketing were to be affected in that fashion…where is Google going to get all that high quality info if there is no incentive to produce it?
If paid search becomes the norm only big pockets will dominate and the wealth of information we are currently being able to produce will dry completely up.
Anyway, nothing like a great food for thought post Charles. Innovative thinking is the gene that produces only the survival of the fittest on the battle field IM.
Barry
Gary
September 3rd, 2008 at 8:55 pm
22“Whoever owns this website is leaving a big, ugly, unnatural footprint behind.”
What exactly is the footprint? Just having backlinks from web2.0 site?
I understand the list of actions that leave big footprints. But do you have proof that the site is doing that? Or are they going down in rankings because others are better than them? Or perhaps their content is not good enough to rank high anymore?
Please give an example of a “bad” backlink going to them.
Gary
John Bertrand
September 4th, 2008 at 2:51 am
23In order to truly unravel Technorati and other methods of tagging, I had to make a few test blogs and tag the posts. I tried several different methods of tagging my posts until I realized how Technorati was working. Along the way, I discovered the best methods for tagging to bring my sites the most targeted traffic. What I found is if you tag posts without knowing what you’re doing, Technorati will not provide you with much of any traffic. Go figure. You’ll just say, “Technorati doesn’t work” and try something else.
But … if you actually dig though the Technorati site, the search engines and analyze what you did and the results you got, you’ll see how to perfect Technorati tags. And then you’ll realize what a powerful tool tagging is for getting more traffic.
So let’s start off with explaining a few of the concepts leading to Technorati … first I’ll cover social bookmarking and tagging just in case you need a little background information.
Social Bookmarking
You’ve probably heard of social bookmarking before. If you haven’t, it’s not all that complicated. It’s really just a way for users to store their bookmarks online. And here’s why this is becoming hot… Basically, if all your favorite webpages are online; they aren’t limited by the computer you’re on. You can access them from your work or home computer just as easily as a public computer at the library. Also, instead of putting them in folders you create (like the old fashioned way you’re forced to organize things in your Internet Explorer favorites tab), your bookmarks are accessible by tags. That means you can assign a single bookmark to multiple categories (in case you’re like me and forget if your Mambo Templates site was in the CMS Folder or the Blog Folder). If you’re still using your web browser to organize bookmarks, you have to put the bookmark into all the folders it belongs to … which is kind of inefficient. Whereas tagging allows you to do this quickly and easily because all you’re really doing is labeling the page. The bookmarking sites take care of the rest.
Cheers,
John
Tony
September 4th, 2008 at 3:21 am
24Mike >>>I don’t know about you, but I only click on natural search engine listings which are on top, certainly not the sponsored ads which are all second rate offers>>>>
I totally agree here. In fact I don’t think I have EVER clicked on a sponsored listing. I wonder what percentage of people actually do (probably those that don’t even realise the difference).
Tony
Tony
September 4th, 2008 at 3:24 am
25Just a thought…
I doubt a site would be penalised for having dodgy footprints. More likely those links would just be ignored. Otherwise, it would be all too easy for someone to sabotage a site of a competitor wouldn’t it?
Tony
http://www.twelfty.co.uk
Charles Heflin
September 4th, 2008 at 11:13 am
26@Tony … I agree with you but ignoring the activity IS the penalty … Where the activity has made a positive impact on search engine rankings before, now it is suddenly ignored and your rankings fall through the floor.
We have several case studies where this has happened. I am the head of a research group and we actually test this stuff for a living
CrustyAdmin
September 4th, 2008 at 11:39 am
27Going forward there are two choices. Build sites deserving of ranking well, or pay for some blackhat seo because the seo accessible to average marketers for free is going away because Google and others will quit counting it.
Like Charles said, they don’t have to penalize you, they only have to quit rewarding you because that is penalizing you IF you benefitted in the past. Doing it that way, someone can’t sink someone else’s site.
Glen Crosier
September 4th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
28Charles, The message I take from this post is about using social media to create real relationships, share valuable content and build a group of followers who will gladly pay for your products and services because you have given them the opportunity to know, like and trust you as a good person to do business with.
If anyone’s in any doubt about how useful social networks are for generating traffic you only have to look at the high profile success stories. I was totally blown away by talking to Gary Vaynerchuk on the phone yesterday. He talked about how he’s getting 80,000 visitors each day to his video blog resulting from his activity on Facebook, Pownce, MySpace, Twitter, etc
When I asked him about his strategy he said it was all about building personal connections and producing regular content that people love. Entertaining, educational and/or enlightening as Charles teaches. He commits big portions of his day to connecting with people on a personal level (see July’s edition of Wired which took a 24 hour snapshot - he spent over 12 hours on email and personal interaction with his followers….he says this is “normal”) Like many others, I find his story an inspiring example of how to build an asset and a real business using social media which as Charles suggests is the “moral of the story” after all…
My 10 cents
Glen Crosier
Brighton, UK
Laurence
September 4th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
29Awesome! i love all your content.
Dare
September 4th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
30Hey Charlie I’m new here…
The method you described with the buywii keyword is not used in long-term marketing at all.
The method of creating a blog with a ‘google-friendly site’ like weebly or tumblr + social loving it is just for the purposes of testing a market to see if the market actually buys using that keyword.
It’s the method of market research available on the Thirty Day Challenge. I use it personally too but just for short-term testing to see if a keyword is profitable and that’s all.
Just to make sure you don’t get confused because I see you getting confused and messing up short vs long term strategies
Charles Heflin
September 4th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
31@Glen Crosier - You hit the nail right on the head… Thank you for that.
@Laurence - Thank you, I do the best that I can
@Dare - I am not confused at all about shot VS long term strategies… Where did you get that? I don’t know what they are teaching at the thirty day challenge but why would you test the effectiveness of a keyword by spending time creating such a beast of a backlink system? … Why not just pay for clicks, it would be cheaper time wise and you would learn its effectiveness as a money term in just a few days (depending on traffic levels).
There is no way that the website shown as an example above is testing the market. If you look at the pattern it is very intricate. Back engineer the strategy… We’ve been picking it apart for several months now.
Charles Heflin
September 4th, 2008 at 3:56 pm
32@Barry … well said, I can now clearly see your perspective… Thank you.
Charles Heflin
September 4th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
33@Anna - You Said:
“In fact I sometimes wonder - what if I did almost nothing but blog posting, video promotions, site building, and commenting? With a few social profiles to keep up with on the side. And maybe guest-post swapping. These seem to all be relatively “real” methods of generating traffic, backlinks, and (even better) friends.”
That is what social networking is all about. Never before in history has it been possible to network and build true communities in such a short span of time. You can build a loyal fan base and then the statement you make above becomes reality… You just have to build it, if you build it and build it properly then this is the asset that you will enjoy.
Social marketing can only begin after a social networking plan has been calculated and then implemented on a consistent basis.
Thank you for your comments
Dare
September 4th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
34Charles…this website is created using the typical 30 Day Challenge method (www.thirtydaychallenge.com)
Research the market - find keywords with a potential to be profitable (adwords listings, competition, products)
Find an affiliate program
Create tumblr.com or weebly.com page and optimize the title, desc. and the body
Market the heck out of it (use social marker or whatever to submit to multiple sites)
You’ll get on the front page within 1-2 days or so if on phrase match there’s less than 30-50.000 competing pages.
Wait to get minimum 200 aff. clicks and see if someone buys. The ideal number is 1000 or so.
That’s the 30 day challenge method in summary.
Btw, how much it would cost on average to test a market via PPC? (you mean adwords or YPN)?
Charles Heflin
September 4th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
35@Dare … sorry but this seems like a long road to haul to figure out the terms that produce the action … money.
What I usually do is fire up a PPC campaign using broad match on a keyword, attach Google analytics to the landing page and then see specifically what keywords produce traffic (from the broad campaign). Then I break it down, run individual tests on “traffic terms” … bidding phrase match on traffic terms sending the traffic to individual pages optimized for those terms to garner sales … This would indicate “money terms”… Now you construct your website and its content, silos and everything else based around terms that have proven to produce income.
How much this costs is entirely dependent on the market you explore and how much time you let go by to determine a successful experiment.
Your effectiveness using this strategy will depend on the effectiveness of your sales funnel of course.
On the other hand…
If you want to rank within 10 minutes for terms with 30,000 to 50,000 competing pages then optimize a wordpress blog (hosted) and submit relevant content. We are seeing indexing times between 6 minutes up to 25 minutes. For long tail terms (30 to 50k competing) we usually see a top 5 placement within 30 minutes. Then you can look at analytics to see where your traffic is coming from and enhance it. This is the free way, PPC testing costs money but you get results across a wide market much faster.
I would not build a full fledged backlink building campaign using social networks (inappropriate use), more time consuming and more expensive than figuring it ALL out in 2 - 3 weeks and then calculating an effective content strategy to carry it on through social channels.
I don’t mean to be adverse, I am only offering constructive criticism here. I hope that this post and all the comments here will help you out. There is always more than one way to reach the same end, some are more efficient and others are less efficient.
I like Ed Dale as a person but don’t totally agree with his methods if what you are telling me here is what he is teaching. If what you say is true then you are learning to use social media for short term gains… The power of social media does not live where you are exploring… The methods you are describing will not be effective for long term success in social media.
Again, I don’t say these things because it is a fantasy of mine … we test this stuff… 9 analysts here with me and more at another office… Ed Dale does not have a research staff (that I know of) so he is where we were 6 months ago… If what you are saying is true… Ed Dale is a good marketer though… That is obvious.
I appreciate your insight and for striking up this interesting discussion.
Anna
September 4th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
36Thanks Charles. It all starts to make more sense to me now. I also signed up for Google friend-connect. I look forward to your next post.
Peter Coughlin
September 5th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
37Thanks Charles, a very thought-provoking post.
It will be interesting to see where things go - will we see people offering a social network building service, I wonder?
Paul Schlegel
September 5th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
38Was this just a coincidence or was this in part a response to the Howie Schwarz videos that came out recently about aggressive bookmarking techniques and creating multiple profiles on social media sites?
Paul
http://www.trafficthatworks.com
Helder
September 5th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
39I agree with you Charles, Google is attacking everything that’s not controled by them, but that is also our fault (our = webmasters) It’s our fault because we’ve been letting ourselves become slaves of google’s wishes and changes. We do everything to please google, well like a friend of mine says google is not God, and if it’s true they have an important place in the internet, they don’t control the internet, and they could control much less if we wouldn’t submit so much to them. Besides google, there’s yahoo, there’s msn, and there are directories, so many of them. But internet is not only search engines, internet was not made by search engines, no matter how important they became. Internet was made by people, internet is a matrix of links that gather websites, poeple are linked from their sites to other sites and so on, if we would bet more on that we wouldn’t be so dependent on google’s will, we wouldn’t have to be dancing to google’s music. People find more websites, by following links from website to website than in the search engines. How many fantastic sites have we all discovered by following links? Lots of them for sure, we don’t have to depend on google, i don’t want to depend on google. I agree with some google rules, yes content should be the ruler, theme density yes, why not, relevance and quality of the sites. But i can’t and never will agree with google trying to punish websites that use other ways to get traffic, google is abusing their power to become the center of web traffic, well they’re not the center and they never will, and it’s in our power to take them more power. Don’t let google take power from social media, because social media is web made by people for people, internet is made by people, not by google, don’t forget that and you’ll never depend on google.
expertlistbuilding blog » Blog Archive List Building with Social Marketing - Don’t Be a Big Foot!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
40[...] To get the details and the warnings, which scared me a bit I must admit - and to find out who the he… [...]
Paul Schlegel
September 5th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
41Also, about the thinking that Google isn’t going to kill the goose that lays the golden egg, etc…
Their handling of the PPC algorithm changes over the past couple years has proven that Google IS willing to kill the goose that lays the golden egg - for the SHORT term if they believe it will lead to a better user experience in the LONG run.
People who were spending $5,000 to $10,000 per day on Adwords got knocked down to close to $0.00 during some of the early Adwords algorithm changes.
But my guess would be that if (or when) Google really gets to the point Charles talks about the algorithm will applied more or less heavily depending on the market category/keywords just as they do with Adwords.
Paul
http://www.trafficthatworks.com
Miss Gisele B.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
42Charles,
This is a bit scary in the sense that for the past 16 mos that’s all we’ve heard about and most of us have spent time and money on article marketing and social marketing. If this no longer works, then what’s left?
Copy (of course), but that’s not enough.
AdWords? The bids are so high now … you really need to know what you are doing not to lose your shirt.
Joint Ventures? Maybe that’s the only way to go other than good SEO … this is QUITE unsettling.
Miss Gisele B.
Dare
September 5th, 2008 at 2:11 pm
43Hey Charlie, I think Ed has a research team…but that’s just my opinion he’ll be able to answer you best.
The interesting this is that your ‘market domination’ report is like…90% same of the 30 day challenge method. You should take a look of the 30dc website if you haven’t done it yet.
However, I was quite interested about your ’social marketing domination’ claim. Do you say it’s better to have 3 well developed accounts than 20 new ones? I would be grateful if you clarify that for me
Regards
the destroyer
September 5th, 2008 at 2:24 pm
44Alright then. It’s time to act PHYSICALLY before Google gets too decentralized.
I’ll bring the baseball bats and gas cans.
Charles Heflin
September 5th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
45@Dare … I will have to check out Ed’s 30DC to see if what you are saying is true. I wrote that document almost a year ago based on elements of Internet marketing that do not change… Now I’m attempting to do the same for social media … what are the elements that don’t change? … It seems they are very similar.
On the social media side of things you ask - Is it better to have 3 well developed accounts or 20 new ones?
I say 3 well developed accounts … the 20 new accounts don’t have a community built behind them so when you bookmark content, it will get no voting action. 20 new accounts might be good for short term gains in multiple search listing for the same keyword/phrase but this is also dwindling slightly from levels we were seeing 5 months ago.
We are seeing evidence that higher voting on certain networks causes search listings to rise… You can watch it almost in real time. Which networks these are I must keep to my private group … I don’t want spammers ruining good systems.
In any case, thank you for your insightful questions.
Jon Symons
September 5th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
46Good post Charles.
For me this goes back to “Everything I needed to know, I learned in Kindergarten”
Whether it’s dieting, sports achievement, making money or SEO, shortcuts never work long term, and therefore have a negative ROI.
From solid market research it is always quite clear:
1. What your market needs.
2. Where they are hanging out
But to uncover, connect to and then deliver on these needs takes real work. Which is great, because it makes it much more rewarding for those willing to do things right.
Jim Nech
September 5th, 2008 at 3:02 pm
47Charles,
What I think is being missed by those supporting 30-DAY is that the projects are able to be used indefinitely to generate some AdSense income even if they are not good targets for PPC.
Another point is that by building a high quality website up front you will be able to purchase clicks at the lowest rate possible because you will have a very high quality score based on the quality of the site you have already built.
With all of that said, I agree with you that PPC up front is the quickest and quite possibly the cheapest route to exploring a market.
JIm Nech
Charles Heflin
September 5th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
48@Paul Schlegel … it must be a coincidence though I do know who Howie is, I have not been following what he does. Howie is in a very different market than I am.
Mike
September 5th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
49Maybe Google is not the only answer?
I do well in google as I keep it honest like you say.
I hold position#1 for some money keywords and
I only have about 20 links that I have gathered over 4 years.
But at the same time I am sick to death with google and there brass!
Maybe it is time for fidly and the network of search exchanges it belongs too!
Coming Soon!
Mike
CrustyAdmin
September 5th, 2008 at 3:45 pm
50Kind of funny really how some of us on one hand say Google doesn’t rule me and at the same time were mad because they might devalue links that we we’re counting on them to honor.
To be honest I would be a great majority of our sites could fall completely out of Google and few would notice because there is a ready replacement. Does the world need one more niche site about pets, weddings, warts, acne, whatever? Probably not.
The only people that Google hurts by getting better algorithms is internet marketers and the sites they pump up artificially. Face it people. We’re not exactly doing the Lord’s work here.
Matthew Longley
September 5th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
51Hi Charles,
I do agree with you on most of what you posted. I do believe that Google is aware of the issue and is doing what they can to stop it, but I also know a few of the bigfoots that you are referring to, and I am familiar with their tactics.
I do agree with you that whenever a person is trying to build a long term business solution, I think they can use social networks to their advantage, but must concentrate on building quality, contributing, and building relationships. The problem is that most bigfoots are blackhat affiliate marketers that think short term. Many of them are being tracked but google and the social networks dont know what to do to stop them. Bigfoots know that there success will prob be temporary but they are hitting it hard while they can. I think this is an issue like the RIAA suing Napster. I believe google will manually tweak the major sites that are being used for manipulation but every time they tweak one, ten more will rise to the surface.
The only way to resolve the issue will be when google, social networks and affiliate networks work together. I dont see that happening anytime soon because many of these bigfoots make the affiliate networks lots of money, so they tend to turn the blind eye to this sort of thing.
I think that a wise business owner plays things safe and plans ahead. Unlike the bigfoots, he is able to sleep at night without worrying about his business being gone in the morning.
Kevin Polley
September 5th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
52I read this thread yesterday and it’s interesting to see how it has developed.
First let me say I agree with Charles and add my thoughts about digital footprints.
From the moment you connect to the internet you start leaving your digital bootprint. Every site you visit, every link you click etc etc. The best place to confirm this if you have doubts is within the cyber security community.
Within that community you’ll find tracking and analysis software being developed or improved. when you put two and two together, you’ll easily see how Google (and other SE’s) can use it to determine ‘un-natural’ practices of link building and inflation of PR.
History repeating itself.
We can’t forget that powerful as it is Google is ‘only’ a business and they need to provide the best service to their customers. i.e. I want to find *useful* information when I search for it (rather than 90+% of the rehashed drivel & dross in some sectors) … and my businesses wants a more effective ROI.
SEO & SEM has always been a game of cat and mouse. Marketers gaming the SE’s and looking for (or developing) a way to automate the process. [And why not
- Done sensibly it's not a bad thing. It is good business practice.] On the other hand Google has always lead the way for others in detecting and dealing with surf spam and it wont stop anytime soon. For proof look at how programs like traffic equalizer used to do the job but lost their effectiveness when Google made changes to the algorithms.
The process will never end but with ever increasing social capability and RDF, the ability of the SE’s to filter out ‘uninteresting’ content for the end user’s queries will, without question, become more accurate than it has become over the past 6 to 8 months. The only viable solution is to build solid sites on a solid foundation with real solid content that people want to read.
Asking ourselves a simple question may help bring home the point. That question is “Why does Google analytics look at the time a visitor spends on a page?” - Could the answer be to check if where they send people is the right place?
30DC
I kept up with the 30DC as much as I could and Ed basically shows folk a way to test a market out. It introduced Market Samurai and the processes that have been outlined above. 30DC is aimed at beginners with time on thier hands and a limited budget. This is evident as the goal of the 30DC is to get people to make thier first $10 online and repeat the process.
Having followed the folk at TZ and Charles for about two years (and used the methods to great effect) I was able to gloss over the 30DC learning in that area. I’m pretty sure it works based on the feedback in the forums but it’s not the most effective way forward for a serious business.
Finally -
The net keeps evolving and we should never forget that marketers are out to make money. Many of them jump on this idea and that, run with it and have no thought about the future what so ever!
99.999% of them have never even been into the fringes of the net’s core to see where the technology has really been heading for the past 12 - 18 months. If they have they aren’t saying - and they’ll probabbly be developing another app to sell us
Yes, some ppl have made money from PLR and MRR articles and yes ppl have followed the advice of marketers or gooroos and now have sites full of content that get visitors. And therein lies the problem. Too much of that content is nothing but automated or poorly written surf spam.
What ‘the industry’ is learning, is that at it’s base level, social networks were developed by ‘geeks’ for a purpose other than SEO or marketing. That purpose was allowing people other than marketers to communicate, share and get access to common data more effectively. ‘Thier’ world was hijacked by marketers and ‘they’ have the power to make subtle changes.
When you read some of the posts in the world of the network developers and sysadmins, who have no concern about sales or seo, you’ll see that web 2.0 is already our last digital footprint and the weight is already shifting forward on to the next foot.
Helder
September 5th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
53I have one site with only 3 months, and i already have an average of 500 unique visitors per day, all done with links and social media. By links i don’t mean buying links, i mean going to blogs, to forums, doing guest posts, inviting other people to guest post. In social media the same thing, and that site keeps growing, connecting with people and i believe it will keep growing, and you know what’s best, i’m not even in the first 100 places in a google search. What does that mean? I don’t depend on google to grow and get traffic. If you say i could get more if i were in a better placement, yes maybe i could, i don’t know, but what i do know is that i never depended on google and i don’t intend to. I’m also already receiving a small percentage of visitors from msn search.
What i mean with all this is that we can’t let one search engine rule our websites and businesses, i think it’s very logical, no? I think no one wants that, so keep writing articles because their read by hundreds or thousands of people, keep blogging and going to forums, keep connecting with people on social media sites, keep the web for people and made by people, not the web made and ruled by google.
Charles Heflin
September 5th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
54@Jon Symons - Well said … thank you. Great to see you here.
Tom Rozof
September 5th, 2008 at 5:57 pm
55Charles, you are demonstrating with this blog one of the key principles for generating good social traffic: Post very thoughtful, relevant and current information, and then toss in a dose of controversy, a pinch of humor and a BIG invitation for other to interact with your content. It’s a recipe for success and for TRAFFIC. All you have to do is look UP and see all the posts in this one section. What’s behind this strategy? It’s the ability to create and deliver QUALITY & AUTHORITY. You understand this and model it.
These two words should be placed on the top of every online marketers computer screen as a constant reminder of what produces both traffic and MONEY. Those who teach, train and model these principles will be the leaders and the benefactors of a rich online future.
It’s my belief that any intelligent, committed person who dedicates themselves to follow their passions and to learning how to build AUTHORITY and QUALITY within their web sites and their businesses will succeed, especially if they execute this within the context of a like minded community.
I would like to clear up one assumption that I often hear, sometimes even from those who might easily affirm the vision I’ve outlined above: Black Hat and Automation should never be placed in the same camp. They are two different animals. Yes, some may merge the two, but they do not share the same genetics.
Automation SHOULD always be at the forefront of helping increase both authority and quality. And it’s the adoption of PURE robust automation that will separate the winners from the constant strugglers. Black hat has nothing to do with it intrinsically. Just because we automate does not mean we will leave an illegal BIG FOOT in our wake. Instead we may leave a legal one, and if I remember right BIG FOOT is very hard to move out of the way. He tends to dominate his niche. Long live BIG FOOT!
iPod cases
September 5th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
56Like the title
and it is so true,that Google will see to it that your site will ranking in page 699 if they think you are blackhattin’ .All it takes is just one pissed offer competitor to complain to Google and there you go they are putting your site under the microscope and if its dirty,they will find it.
Good article Heflin!
Charles Heflin
September 5th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
57@Tom Rozof … Quality and Authority is the under current of this blog post thank you for putting it in a way that many can understand.
Thank you for your kind words… I appreciate it.
I’m sure we’ll be chatting soon.
Charles Heflin
September 5th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
58@Kevin Polley … Outstanding post!
You are dead on and your experience shines through in your words. I appreciate you stopping by and posting your insight. I would stand behind those words any day.
Thank you
Charles Heflin
September 5th, 2008 at 6:59 pm
59@Matthew Longley - I agree with your perspective … Google and all the other search engines and social networks will continue to battle spam.
I believe that by adding social features and paying attention to human activity on social platforms Google will be able to effectively weed spammers out through crowdsourcing it to everyone that uses the Internet in a genuine way.
Then a whole new spam game will crop up (agreed) but now Google has enlisted the help of the crowd rather than their own limited staff. There are still issues that will have to be overcome though.
Mark M. Bravura
September 5th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
60Hi Charles,
You have masterfully articulated what I already knew at an intuitive level. And yes, “this will be the single most brilliant move that Google has made to date in weeding out spam and delivering “human voted best” content” … about time!
Best regards,
Mark
Ray Baker
September 5th, 2008 at 9:56 pm
61@Heider Well said! Google’s definitely a stand-out company but it would be an error to depend on it entirely. There are many more traffic avenues available. Charles always identifies the valueable elements and paths. That’s because he researches. Many others will tell you that Google is the only path - that’s sad to think they believe that.
The answer most often with any marketing lies with a mixture of several promotional elements and never one volatile tool or source. See the article on Google and the Fear of Retribution. I won’t leave a link here. If your interested, you can access it from my name link above.
I support the quality paths and tools which help you achieve that. However, most Black Hat activity usually needs to be replaced or reworked especially when it relies on gaming the algorythms or bots. People will eventually be the only deciding force. Directly and indirectly. Just do your promotion based on that is my input and hopefully you won’t need to re work things but simply grow your business instead.
Matthew Longley
September 5th, 2008 at 9:56 pm
62@ Charles - I do believe that most social websites already have the feature for users to weed out spam from their rankings. In many sites you can bury posts, such as digg, or rate videos or articles such as youtube. This way users determine what content is garbage and what content is good. That works for the social networks to filter the garbage, but for seo purposes, you can send some links to a digg posts with only one digg and still get it to rank. You dont need a top rated video in youtube, you just need a video in youtube with the right title.
So I believe the social marketing websites are already doing their part to filter the garbage. If google was to open social reviews and voting to organic search, what is to stop me from paying 10,000 amazon turkers .02 each to review and vote for my site?
Mike
September 6th, 2008 at 8:34 am
63Interesting,
Reading all the posts, makes me wonder, who really clicks on anything but natural search results now? Yes, Google is the king, but doesn’t is strike you as strange how they are constantly scrambling in a helter skelter manner lately. Seems to me they have lost their way, and I think they know the PPC bread and butter is dying a slow death.
No matter how many strategies are developed to increase PPC revenues, they are all short lived in my experience. You can only exploit this tactics for a small window of time, then it closes as saturation kills it. This is a faster moving target today than even a year ago, just look at all the changes Google has made to counter declining market impact. The most important issue today is how long a person visits a site, bottom line, if you don’t have constantly enhanced content, forget it, nothing else matters.
Helder
September 6th, 2008 at 8:42 am
64@ Ray Baker, thanks for your comment, i agree with you, we should use all available ways of getting traffic, but without using unethical ways, always using quality paths like you say, and above all never depending on one source, we should always be in control of our sites/businesses. I’m a big believer in internet for people and made by people, internet belongs to people, not to companies or SE’s
I’ll be seeing your article asap, thanks
Larkland Morley
September 6th, 2008 at 9:25 am
65I don’t think google has changed. Their goal is to provide the best answer to the searcher and ultimately their advertisers can benefit..
You could call it “no good content left behind”
Joerg Rauh
September 6th, 2008 at 9:48 am
66It is indeed a pleasant experience that when you activate a new website you can switch on a stream of visitors with your PPC-Ads. Many years ago I saw a life demo by Perry Marshall which was impressive and convincing.
To me that’s where the pleasure ends with PPC. Because now you are faced with a never ending increase in regulation and price. Do I really have to give so much control to SEs? To me the ever increasing control is more of a problem than the price, because there are ways to bring the price down.
And as a user of SEs I’m not at all impressed with hundreds of thousands of lines of answers to my search word with no way to drill down (e.g. by date, by forums, by articles). The database is there and can easily let the user include an additional “where clause” but that’s not being offered. So the users too have to live with what the SEs let them have. I can’t see this great surfing experience SEs claim to give to users.
With regards to marketing on the internet I have heard again and again: The value is in the List. Looks to me that list owners having lists of the right size and quality for their businesses, would not depend on PPC nor on SEs for their orders. If that’s the case they’d prosper even if there were no SEs around.
I know some that do and stay unaffected by whatever SEs are going to implement.
When you come to think of it an SE really is a group of life people. Why wouldn’t they treat you and me like we are all on a big boat?
Aren’t we?
Beyond Social Network Marketing and SEO for Business | e-commerce and video marketing
September 6th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
67[...] excellent article by Charles Heflin about digital footprints and how they affect social marketing activities needs to be read by anyone with an online business who is using any automated tactics to [...]
Best Optical Mouse
September 6th, 2008 at 7:06 pm
68Yeah….
great article…
Nice looking for dis…
We like has a automatic robot
Respect,
http://bestopticalmouse.blogspot.com
Anna
September 6th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
69@Helder - Hi there, speaking of guest-posts, if you are the Helder I think you are I still owe you a guest post! (Guilty Face). I’m trying to catch up … life has been wild lately …
Anyway I was really impressed by what you said about your stats as a result of real social activities versus traditional SEO. I am curious, how much time do you think you spend on these things every day or week? Ie, if you didn’t have time to work on it for a while, do you think the traffic would continue?
Just curious. I reached # 2 and #3 on Google for a couple of my sites but they were not really high-traffic or high-income keywords. However they do get traffic from the search engines and it continues even when I am not able to work on them (declines a bit I suppose), so I was just curious on how it goes for you.
Chris Lang
September 7th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
70Charles,
It is about time someone came out and said what I have been saying for most of 2008. It has been a long road of being called out as full of crap.
Don’t just submit your own content to social bookmarking sites.
Don’t use social bookmarking submission software. I don’t care if Jack Humphrey and Howie Schwartz say it OK and it won’t matter. Don’t do it.
Build one social profile and participate highly in that profile especially if it is a social bookmarking site.
Submit content better than yours, you will be judged by the company you keep in social bookmarking.
Don’t shout your own blog content over and over in Digg, Google is watching this and is going to kick your butt for it.
The Google social bookmarking slapdown is coming and it is coming next month. Q3 to those of us who follow the PR updates.
Google is rolling out their own social network and social bookmarking tools right now. Kind of ironic timing wouldn’t you say Charles?
AND Google Chrome too?
AND AdSense for feeds?
AND a major AdSense slapdown in August?
Not to mention changing the SERPS HTML so you can’t use most SEO ranking analysis software last week?
Charles is absolutely right here and things are about to go crazy for a while and Google is going to mislead us like the Digg buyout. Misdirection at it’s best.
Social bookmarking is a tool that augments SEO, not replaces it.
Those of us who have been using green SEO tactics will be left standing.
Will you?
JohnT
September 7th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
71Hello Charles,
Great article. I agree with what you say for the most part, especially since much of it is similar to what Chris Lang has been telling me for up to 6 months now and things I’ve found to have merit. Good Job! It’s nice to see others opening up about this and trying to tell people who things work. Thanks for the post.
Helder
September 7th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
72Hi Anna, yes i’m the Helder you’re thinking, and i didn’t forget about the guest post
i know you’ve been busy, so when you can you write, don’t worry about it. Now answering your questions, in the first 3 months i can tell i spent about 2 hours a day, commenting on blogs, on forums, socializing in social media sites, building contacts, submiting my own posts and posts from other people. That was it, about 2 hours a day. About your other question, in the last month, month and a half, i have done almost nothing, except going to blogs and not everyday, and my traffic keeps rising. I’ve also writen lots of articles and press releases in the first month, and i still get a lot of traffic from that. So if there’s a time when you don’t have the time to be socializing, don’t worry, traffic won’t stop.
That’s the big difference between socializing, good link building and SEO, in SEO you have to write and act according to the SE wishes, you have to pay atention to any changes in their policies, you have to deal with what they want. With social media and quality link building, the links remain, and your contacts remain, and when you have visitors who keep coming back to your site, those visitors will also bring new visitors, and it keeps growing, that’s internet made for people, not for SE’s.
I think there’s another myth called page ranking and it’s importance related to traffic. I have a blog in blogger, it’s writen in portuguese and it’s dedicated to social causes, in that blog i have a page rank of 2 in google, with my fitness site i have a page rank of 1 in google, and yet i have a lot more traffic in my fitness site than in the other blog, so page rank is not that important when it comes to traffic. I’m not saying it’s not important, but it’s not that big deal like some people try to paint.
Charles Heflin
September 7th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
73@Chris Lang … Thanks for backing me up here… I know you’re a die hard tester too and have seen evidence similar to what I alluded to here.
I’ll be in touch soon … I’m in the weeds big time … lot’s to do, too little time.
Social Media Marketing (A Warning)
September 8th, 2008 at 9:03 am
74[...] Heflin recently discussed Footprints Left by Social Marketing on his blog, which is well worth a quick read. (thanks goes to Rob Sellen for sharing that link [...]
How to Use Social Media… Successfully
September 8th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
75[...] seasoned marketers already know that it’s short-lived, and that those practices will leave footprints that will ultimately backfire on [...]
The Content vs. Links Debate … Again » Internet Business
September 10th, 2008 at 6:59 am
76[...] site for a while, but your tricks will catch up to you eventually. Here’s an apt quote from Charles Heflin: Google is famous for allowing people to game their system (for a while) and then come down with an [...]
The social media bubble that wasted your time by Charles Heflin
September 10th, 2008 at 11:52 am
77[...] Comments The Content vs. Links Debate … Again » Internet Business on I spotted Bigfoot on your website doing social marketingHow to Use Social Media… Successfully on I spotted Bigfoot on your website doing social [...]
Marc Berry
September 11th, 2008 at 6:29 am
78Nothing annoys me more than getting a new follower on Twitter only to see they follow 1,500 people and only have 13 followers.
Twitter spam FTL!
ezSEO Blog » » EzSEO Newsletter # 219
September 21st, 2008 at 2:47 am
79[...] Social Marketing Footprints [...]
subimal
October 17th, 2008 at 8:52 am
80A great post Charles. Thank you very much for warning us of malpractices for getting backlinks specially as far big boss GOOGLE is concerned
visit web site
November 2nd, 2008 at 4:03 pm
81visit web site…
How to choose the options and strategies that deliver the best payoff from your adwords advertising budget….
Khairul Anuar
November 6th, 2008 at 2:36 am
82This article is really enlightning!!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: Traffic from social networks does not convert!
next post: The social media bubble that wasted your time
to top of page...