26
Aug
2008
Posted by Charles Heflin as Social Networking

This post is a continuation of a series that I am doing on gaining a return on effort and money spent in social media (ROI). In the last post in this series I had made the following statement:
The level of success in social media (as determined by ROI) is directly proportional to the speed at which you gain trust among your audience, the social nature of your products/services, and the nature of your social network traffic conversion funnel (sales funnel). Don’t confuse a social network traffic conversion funnel with traditional Internet marketing tactics.
Now let me elaborate on that statement a little bit…
For example, if you spend 1 man hour in social networks to gain 1 newsletter subscriber then obviously your return on time investment is not worth the effort. You need to re-think your strategy because nobody is paying attention to you. How much is a new subscriber worth to you? $1, $2, $5, $100?
If your newsletter subscribers are worth $1 each then 1 hour of time to gain 1 new subscriber is not efficient unless your time is valued at $1 per hour… Right?
It seems that many people are mistakenly making this assessment of their social media effort without looking at the bigger picture and these same people are spreading the message that social networking is “not worth the effort”.
It is easy to see how this assessment could be made but this false assessment fails to include a crucial element I call the “compounding of community”. To use an analogy let’s say that you have opened up a new bank account that offers a 10% daily return on money you have on deposit. Now let’s suppose that you deposit $1. The $1 represents one friend, follower, contact, etc. that you have gained in a single social network.
Now in order to earn your 10% daily return you need to communicate with your new friend and work to “deepen” the relationship by commenting on or contributing to something that is very personal to them such as:
Now, according to the law of reciprocity, that friend owes you the same favor in return. This is how you gain your interest on the $1. This is the “unwritten law” … In networks like Digg where diggs are not so much granted by the nature of the content submitted, they are granted because of the law of reciprocity. Power Digg users understand this law and use it to get their stories dugg to the front page. Content is a secondary consideration… relationships are primary. These relationships multiplied by hundreds or thousands is where success in social media is derived. The law of reciprocity = interest in the social media bank.
I understand that not everyone will reciprocate, some are very busy, some are very egotistical, some just don’t care… This is human nature so you have to consider that the interest you gain on your “friend in the bank” ($1) is not going to be 100% … more like 10%. Of course it is impossible to reciprocate in this manner with everyone that becomes a friend or follower, that is another reason why the return is not 100%.
The law of reciprocity is the basis of all friendships and trust. It is how you network like Paul Revere and Quincy Jones. If someone links to your blog post, don’t you always look to see what they wrote? Do you not feel a very human obligation to return that favor at some point down the road if not immediately?
Do you not “remember” that person? Have they not branded themselves in your mind?
The point is to acknowledge the friends/followers which speeds up the process of gaining trust. By commenting on the friends content (or any other personal item), the law of reciprocity will cause the friend to feel an obligation to return the favor. This is how you gain more comments on your content. This is how you get others to bookmark it, share it, digg it, link to it, etc., etc., etc. This is how you build a following of people that trust you. This is how you accelerate the process of gaining trust. This is how you brand your name and image (avatar) in the mind of your community and make it synonymous with quality. This is how you build community.
It takes time to build a community of trusting friends, followers, contacts, acquaintances, etc. Before you can expect a favorable return on your social media investment, you have have to build your communities in this manner.
To use an analogy, you can’t expect a new home to protect you from the rain until the roof is built. In a similar manner you can’t expect a return on your social media effort until your communities are built. In this respect, you can’t gauge the effectiveness of your social media effort without first building the foundation.
Going back to my original statement…
The level of success in social media (as determined by ROI) is directly proportional to the speed at which you gain trust among your audience.
Element 1: The law of reciprocity is the tool that aids in “speeding up” the gaining of trust.
Also part of this statement is Element 2…
The level of success in social media (as determined by ROI) is also tied to the social nature of your products/services, and the nature of your social network traffic conversion funnel (sales funnel).
These two points are the subject of the next post in this series. I invite comments and questions to help clarify the point of this post.
What is your take?
Learn how to apply Social Media and SEO 2.0 to your business click here.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You may also follow my updates on Twitter.
30 Responses
Real unlocked phones
August 26th, 2008 at 10:33 am
1you said”The level of success in social media”
I am starting to see more and more of these sites that have inacted the “nofollow” tag to posts.Gather, propeller,stumble,ect all now have npofollow tags,why would I want to waste my time in posting to these sites seeing how there is NO link value …
?
Dexter Babcock
August 26th, 2008 at 10:36 am
2Charles:
This is a very valuable article! I appreciate your reference to: “The law of reciprocity is the basis of all friendships and trust. It is how you network like Paul Revere and Quincy Jones. ”
That reference and the link to the related articles are highly insightful. All these thoughts related to social networking apply as well to all types of communication networking for business and personal purposes.
I know that I have a bit of William Dawes in me. ( You will have to follow the links and read the references to understand)
Thank you bringing these points up for reflection, planning and change of action.
Regards,
Dexter Babcock
Charles
August 26th, 2008 at 10:54 am
3@Real unlocked phones - Using social media for the purpose of building links to your website is the wrong outlook and is dying a slow and miserable death. Success in social media is derived from community building and empowering your communities to crowdsource your content through the law of reciprocity.
The SEO value of gaining inbound links from the “mention of others” on social platforms with “no follow” is of little to no consequence. I have evidence that the crowdsourcing effect has almost immediate influence on search engine rankings. Does this do away with the “nofollow” theory? (it is a theory) … I am not sure. All I know is that quality social media interaction does increase search engine visibility… bottom line.
Charles
August 26th, 2008 at 10:56 am
4@Dexter Babcock - thank you for the comment and the phone call. Sorry about the terrible cell phone reception I had
… too many “can you hear me nows” but a good conversation in any case.
Thanks,
Charles
CrustyAdmin
August 26th, 2008 at 11:09 am
5So fake being a buddy for more sales. SoMedia does suck because it’s all iditots with sub second attention spans running around trying to out wank each other.
Hiram
August 26th, 2008 at 11:21 am
6I read a pretty good book years ago called “The Law of Reciprocity” (or something similar). It was in a business class and we were discussing the fact that most businesses (this was back in the 80’s) were going to, or had already gone, to a “flat” or a “matrix” type of organization. The bottom line is that the old hierarchy structure of “one person, one boss” was gone and that you could no longer get people to do what you wanted/needed them to do just because of your “position.” You had to find other ways - like finding out what they needed or wanted done and helping them to do it. To repay the favor, they in turn would help you get what you needed done. Reciprocity in a nutshell.
I’m not sure how this applies to websites but the theory is sound.
Hiram
Charles
August 26th, 2008 at 11:29 am
7@Hiram - this does not apply directly to websites but can lead to the overall success of your website by building communities of trusting friends and followers who will contribute to or buy from your website.
Charles
August 26th, 2008 at 11:30 am
8@CrustyAdmin - If your take on this is to be “fake” then you have missed the entire point.
Bill Whetstone
August 26th, 2008 at 11:34 am
9We are all weary of the glut of sales pitches and the Fear of Financial embarrassment or jealousy of the success of others can create some extreme acts of impatience and cynicism. Real friends suffer some hardships together as well as celebrating the good times. These are the best and the worst of times for the mass to participate in monetizing the New Media. We all have to help educate each other or die in solo bitterness.
Omar
August 26th, 2008 at 11:45 am
10I think that social media is a genuine arena for developing lasting relationships and establishing yourself as someone people can count on, can trust, and who know their stuff. I think the days of traditional marketing (in your face sales page etc.) are slowly dying and we are rapidly moving into a new era where the winners will be those who can provide the most value. If you take a look at a lot of key players in internet marketing, even Charles with the Social Marketing Blueprint, are giving away a lot of valuable info to gain your trust… and ultimately sales. It’s no longer about selfishness, but about selflessness.
Hiram
August 26th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
11@Charles - I saw an interesting video with Gary Vaynerchuk, the “wine guy” (Google him, he’s pretty well known). One of the ways he uses social media is to build a brand, just like Coke or Pepsi has done, only in this particular case, the brand is him. He’s become known as the “wine guy” through his series of videos, blogs, and so on.
In his case (and it probably applies to most of us), his website is NOT the main thing he’s trying to promote. His website is simply another media channel through which he promotes his brand, which again, is him - his expertise, his viewpoint, his knowledge.
I think most of us that are trying to make an income through the Internet sometimes forget this. What people want is more of US - our opinions, our thoughts, our programs, etc - not some slick website with a high PR. Social media helps us to get that exposure and through that exposure, you build creditability and trust — not in your website, but in you. Once you’ve got that, you can sell, recommend, or market pretty much anything through any channel (web, print, direct mail, etc) and people are going to pay attention.
Have I got the right idea?
Hiram
Christy
August 26th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
12Great article. My dad, a long-time salesman with 30+ years in his field, insists that you need to call your contacts at least on a weekly basis and go see them regularly. And as much as I think of him as an old-fashioned sales guy, business really is about building relationships and trust. The only way you can do that in social networking is to provide something of value first before you receive. When you provide a service, rather than a product, it’s even more important for people to get to know and trust you.
Cool Olympic Pictures
August 26th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
13Hi Charles,
Pretty good article on social media. Ya agree they way how you see it regarding social media marketing. I guess maybe most of us forgot to analyze on our marketing strategies that we overlook things such as ROI.
Sometime we concern too much about the nofollow tag or other matters related to social media that we don’t put more effort on evaluate our ROI. But maybe too much distraction make us lose focus on things.
Social Media ROI - Your Brand, LLC Forums
August 26th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
14[...] Is it registered users? Sales? If this matters to you, this post by Charles Heflin called Why does ROI in Social Media Suck may be of interest. __________________ David Sandusky like an ad agency, but for people w/ the [...]
Robert C - The Wholesale Products Guy
August 26th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
15“The level of success in social media (as determined by ROI) is directly proportional to the speed at which you gain trust among your audience.”
This might have already been made evident in this post, but I never use Social Media to specifically garner subscribers, or buyers of any product I am selling. ROI is not a consideration for me. I realize that most of the traffic to be gained from SM will be just “tire kickers”.
My goal is to use SM as a way to increase back links to my site, or to target specific keywords. Great article, and the results of your efforts concerning SM, are much appreciated..
Robert C. - The Wholesale Guy
Mark M. Bravura
August 26th, 2008 at 7:16 pm
16Hi Charles,
Spot on; can’t wait for the next segment - highest Kudos!
Best regards,
Mark
Peter Matriciano
August 26th, 2008 at 7:40 pm
17Awesome work Charles!
I’ve just subscribed to the feed - hopefully I can learn more about marketing in the social media.
Are you going to make this into an awesome product like the Master Plan?
Cheers,
Peter
Ilias Glenis
August 26th, 2008 at 9:34 pm
18Hi Charles, good solid info. here. Thanks. Perhaps you could touch upon this little discussed fact in one of your next posts…
How the hell do some of these sites even function?
Can anyone else relate?
I get so excited about learning social marketing from Charles and others, but when I go to use the sites I can’t figure out how to use the power linking aspects, so I soon move on to something else, or what some of these sites are even about, and what they can actually do.
Take for example Twitter…
I just heard about Twitter so I’ve started using it more. But I have yet to really grasp what the hell it is and how to use it to “it’s” fullest capacity!
Forget about what I think I know. i can’t even figure out what I can do with it.
BTW: If you’re interested visit me on Twitter here…
http://twitter.com/meditation_guru
You can witness first hand how I’m stumbling all over myself.
So yes Charles, could you please include some basic info. or an FAQ of sorts for what some of these social sites can actually do, and brief tutorials on how to get the most out of them, and how to use them?
Live well,
Ilias Glenis
http://www.MyMonkBuddy.com
Corrisa Malone
August 27th, 2008 at 3:10 am
19Good article Charles.
I never thought of how the Law of Reciprocity plays a part in social media marketing. I just never even considered that angle of it.
I knew the goal of SM is to build an audience but the reciprocity twist makes total sense.
I like the way you figured the ROI…in fact a lot of people don’t think about whether or not they’re getting results with all the effort they’re putting into their social media campaigns.
A lot of people think it’s a waste of time. I would have to agree, UNLESS you know what you’re doing.
And measuring your effectiveness by how many subcribers/contacts your making lets you know immediately where you need to tweak your efforts.
A good book that talks about “reciprocity” is Robert Cialdini’s The Psychology of Persuasion.
Keep your articles coming Charles. This one definitely gave me a new paradigm for social marketing.
Thanks!
Corrisa
DIANA
August 27th, 2008 at 8:08 am
20Hi dear friend charles,
This is not a easy task to elaborate in simple way and a hard topic to crack .
YOU may not or never satisfied with your ROI.
I think social media depends on quality/standard and your ability to compete alongwith your technology whatever you have latest/existing.
Depends on your strong network capacity also in todays context
Traffic from social networks does not convert! by Charles Heflin
August 28th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
21[...] Comments DIANA on Why does ROI in social media suck?Corrisa Malone on Why does ROI in social media suck?Why does ROI in social media suck? | on Is there [...]
why-does-roi-in-social-media-suck |
August 29th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
22[...] Interesting post by Charles Heflin at CharlesHeflin.com/roi-in-social-media/ [...]
Lennie Appelquist
September 2nd, 2008 at 11:01 am
23You make some really great points here. I hadn’t actually framed it as “reciprocity” but it really is. Gaining trust is key!
Thanks,
Lennie
Warren Whitlock
September 2nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm
24Seems to me that the same folks worrying about ROI are the ones that try to force social media into something they already know.
Not a bad idea on the surface. If what you are doing is working, you want more of it, and compare every new idea to what you are doing… if so, more power to ya.
If you aren’t getting massive results from what you do, change what you are doing. There’s no law that says you have to use social media, but if you do.. I suggest you try a few things and decide what is right for you.
I spend hours in a day on social media, but NEVER suggest that other need to do this. You don’t have to be a social media expert to use tools like Twitter. You just have to want to make meaningful connections and leverage your time.
I spotted Bigfoot on your website doing social marketing by Charles Heflin
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:33 am
25[...] At The Home Business Archive on Traffic from social networks does not convert!Lennie Appelquist on Why does ROI in social media suck?Tom Rozof on Traffic from social networks does not convert!Anonymous on Clocking the speed of [...]
Chuck Bartok
September 5th, 2008 at 8:14 pm
26I really enjoyed this thread and comments.
I have been using social Networking in my businesses
for close to 50 Years
My current clients of course are integrating the Internet Power,
but we always focus on the Principle of reciprocity and the Law of Attraction
40 years ago, I spent my Time in the community offering my Time and energy to build Positive environments.
My appointment book was always full of Unsolicited prospects who SOUGHT my service. We are still implementing these methods only with a Broader Global base,
thanks to this “computer thing”
Robert Worstell
September 12th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
27Charles,
Great post as usual.
Commented on Facebook first, and that ran me dry - a bit.
Key points I saw (in addition to the excellent dissection of traditional marketing above by others) were Chuck’s point that this Law of Reciprocity is as old as the hills (or older) aka Golden Rule, among others. Give and then get - Earl Nightingale dissects this in his “Strangest Secret”.
The other point is that the article references bring up Malcolm Gladwell’s “Tipping Point”. He reveals that Paul Revere was more successful on that ride than another rider who went out the same night in a different direction - because Paul Revere had a broader network and had developed a broad trust relationship through that network. People took him seriously.
“Tipping Point” is an incomplete theory, but probably has more to do with social networks than conventional marketing.
Jean Ann Van Krevelen
September 20th, 2008 at 8:22 am
28The critical issue in social media is to have a strategy…taking the company’s mission and translating it into the most productive apps with a coordinated amount of time…reduces the amount of wasted energy. I have a lot of clients who spin their wheels when trying to use social media as a traffic driver.
Vishal
October 1st, 2008 at 9:01 am
29wow! amazing article. never did think of ROI in this way. well written.
renaissance chambara | Ged Carroll - Links of the day
November 2nd, 2008 at 6:01 pm
30[...] Why does ROI in social media suck? [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: Clocking the speed of content indexing
next post: Traffic from social networks does not convert!
to top of page...