21
Aug
2008
Posted by Charles Heflin as Social Media

Now that social media has entered the forefront of awareness among most online business one perplexing question remains…
How can we produce awareness that will produce a positive return on investment for time and/or money spent in social media?
In other words … How can we produce a positive cash flow by utilizing the seemingly limitless prospect base that is having millions of conversations about millions of things every day?
For the past 2 years me and my staff here at the SEO20/20 labs have ignored all else and honed in on the answer to this perplexing question. Though we have been producing measurable ROI using social media for years, we were perplexed on how to create a formula so the process could be effectively taught to others.
The answer to this question is as varied as all the business models in existence but one common thread rings through loud and clear… We had to find the elements of online social media that do not change and then utilize that knowledge to produce an effective action plan. This was the beginning of a chain of events that has led to the answer to this perplexing question.
My next flurry of emails will be an attempt to pass this knowledge on to you in an actionable format.
The following statements are statements of fact that we have discovered through rigorous testing, observing and implementing over the past two years…
Statement 1: The level of success in social media (as determined by ROI) is directly proportional to the speed at which you gain trust among your audience, the social nature of your products/services, and the nature of your social network traffic conversion funnel (sales funnel). Don’t confuse a social network traffic conversion funnel with traditional Internet marketing tactics.
Statement 2: Primarily using social network systems as a way to garner incoming links (link love) as a method to increase rankings in search engines is a short-lived strategy. We have evidence that Google is paying attention to the level of “community” and “friendship” and “voting” that occurs within accounts that list your website link. It is easy to spot footprints left behind by social media black/grey hat tactics. If you want to destroy your social media presence and your search engine visibility then feel free to attempt using social networks as a link building exercise.
Statement 3: Social media networks (forums, blogs, micro-blogs, social networks, etc.) sole reason for existence is to allow two-way communication. They thrive on it and would die without it. You must engage people within each network you participate in or your efforts in these networks will be small to none. Social bookmarking for the purpose of increasing awareness is not enough. You must also increase awareness of yourself (a representative of your brand) within the communities that you place your bookmarks, content and other engaging material.
Statement 4: All content must be educational, enlightening or entertaining. If content falters from any of these 3 elements then you will go nowhere in social media.
Statement 5: If you are what is considered an Internet marketer (or online marketing professional) you have to unlearn everything you have learned. Success in social media is determined by your ability to interact with your target audience in an educational, enlightening, or entertaining way (the 3 E’s of social media engagement), not by how crafty you can be in shouting your business message.
Statement 6: There is a specific law of engagement in social media networks that you must adhere to or you will get ripped to shreds. I will cover this in detail as we move this series along.
Statement 7: Sales resulting from social media interaction are directly proportional to the level of trust that you are able to achieve from your audience. Trust is never gained through promotion of any sort. Return on time and investment comes indirectly through branding, search engine visibility and from those seeking more information about the persona who is engaging in the social media space to see what they (or their business has to offer). They will find your “buy now” button without you shoving it in their face if engaged appropriately.
Statement 8: The act of empowering communities in social media also has a positive effect on search engine visibility that removes focus from traditional SEO and places it firmly on community driven content delivery. SEO becomes automated through Crowdsourcing (Jeff Howe). The rules of SEO have changed in a dramatic way. The focus on traditional (technical) SEO is melding together with what I call social rankings or “The New SEO”. Focus on community trust which leads to crowdsourcing which leads to a dramatic increase in search engine visibility across all major search engines.
Statement 9: There are 2 main elements in social media engagement that leads to branding and ROI:
Statement 10: You must listen to your target audience to determine their needs before engaging them. Chris Brogan (and many others) recently drove this point home in a recent Twebinar. Others such as Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff of Groundswell have paved the way for business to become aware of the social phenomenon.
There is much more to cover in this series (more coming soon) and many more people to cite and credit. I am positive I am missing some statements from the 10 above. These are just the ones I could think of off the top of my head. Feel free to add to these statements, this could make for an interesting discussion.
Learn how to apply Social Media and SEO 2.0 to your business click here.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. You may also follow my updates on Twitter.
55 Responses
Jay Deragon
August 21st, 2008 at 6:27 am
1Excellent article and I’ll look forward to your next round of observations. I also added the article to Business Weeks recent launch of Business Exchnange under the topic of “Social Media Failures.
to get early access to the exchange use this pre-approved invitation link
http://topicexchange.businessweek.com/sign-up/?r=BLBL99
Itayi
August 21st, 2008 at 8:11 am
2Great post. I look forward to the rest that follows. Social Media is big and we should make the most of it.
derrick sorles - web 2.0 consultant
August 21st, 2008 at 8:16 am
3Great info! And I have one word for my clients…PATIENCE! Once they get the concept, the want to jump right in and expect traffic, sales and ROI in a month! It takes time. It takes time to build the content and establish yourself as an expert, thereby building trust. Some people can see results in 4-6 months, but it take a year. But it is worth the investment.
James Schramko
August 21st, 2008 at 8:19 am
4Charles,
(I just twittered this post).
I am shocked that it took 10 people 2 years to figure out you have to be trusted and provide value…this should be obvious.
Did you mention being real - this is essential in an environment where people are not able to hide easily. It also creates goodwill.
(Typo in statement 9 part 2 - you can edit if required)
Regards
James
Rita Wilhelm
August 21st, 2008 at 8:22 am
5Hi Charles,
I could not agree more with you! You’ve done a great job in organizing your findings in a meaningful way. It all comes down to the relationship that you build. And… isn’t that how it is in the non-virtual world as well?
Rita Wilhelm
Tracking the ROI of Social Media | Express Marketing Memo
August 21st, 2008 at 8:22 am
6[...] Read more and get involved in the discussion about the ROI of social media. [...]
Charles
August 21st, 2008 at 8:28 am
7@Derrick - I agree… patience is the name if the game in social media. Another important point is that with patience comes reward. The reward is the compounding effect that social media interaction has… It grows over time as you make more and more people aware of your message. The reward is greater though the results coming in may be very slow at first.
Slow is good though because that means you reached some people… Where you can reach some, you can reach many… just rinse and repeat.
@Jay and @itayi - thank you for reading and commenting.
John Austwick
August 21st, 2008 at 8:37 am
8Great article Charles, although being a novice with social marketing, I find just being genuine and taking interest has already reaped rewards.
My analogy is people like to watch soaps and even folow what is happening with character they don’t like, with social sites the same type of human nature prevails, people pick up on your character and like to be updated with what’s happening. Even better they have the choice of interacting, both people and search engines can find inconsistencies and trickery the result is the same both will dump you.
Following your lead, Be yourself be true and work on social sites like real time diary entry’s, works for me, the trust level builds and the circle of influence increases.
I look forward to the next article.
John
Charles
August 21st, 2008 at 8:38 am
9@James - it’s the “not so obvious” parts of the obvious that took us a long time to decipher… We basically spent all that time categorizing and dismissing 18 different types of social platforms looking through the lens of Internet marketing, SEO and pure social interaction to determine where the roads meet to form an actionable and effective process.
We needed to learn how to teach traditional Internet marketers and marketing firms to move their thinking in regard to social media. The approach is totally awkward to marketers.
Furthermore, we had to categorize the social networks so their purpose in regard to business application could be understood by marketers.
There is a lot behind the scenes and it does seem that we have come up with some obvious or common sense conclusions… but we had to test from a marketer’s perspective in order to show them how to shift their gears.
I agree … Being real should be one of the statements above … I knew I missed one!
Charles
August 21st, 2008 at 8:44 am
10@Rita Wilhelm - yes, I am happy to see that the Internet has become a mirror reflection of people in the offline world … just at a faster pace.
@John Austwick - Thank you for the insightful comment
Tribute Band Reviews
August 21st, 2008 at 9:18 am
11Hi Charles
There is a lot of misinformation about social media marketing, some internet marketing guru’s are telling people to put up multiple profiles on as many social networks as possible and link to their main site with keywords in the anchor text. I’ve seen some of these profiles on places like Squidoo and Hubpages, the content consists of 1 or 2 sentences and then a link. This isn’t adding anything of value to these social networks and these pages should be taken down in my opinion. It’s just plain trickery!
At the end of the day, you’ve got to add value and be real and honest.
I look forward to reading further posts in this series.
John O’Hara
United Kingdom
James Schramko
August 21st, 2008 at 9:20 am
12Charles,
I think testing is a great way to arrive at a conclusion!
Possibly the main social networks are in the business of data selling and have users contribute content. So it seems fair they can also be used for legitimate linking purposes.
The main adjustment for old marketers is the fact that they can’t just ram it one way anymore. People can just un-follow and they have been voted off instantly. There is more accountability than before. (That is why I mentioned being real).
The smart ones are quickly scrambling to learn social media with declarations like “I was wrong about Twitter - it really is good….”
This is a great revolution for the industry.
Regards
James
Michael S. Copeland
August 21st, 2008 at 9:21 am
13This is a GREAT Blog post!
So many marketers are trying to get as many hits as they can in whatever way they can. This mostly leads to unsocial behavior.
Social Networking is about being SOCIAL. Socializing is a 2 way street. The biggest thing marketers don’t get is that People buy things from People.
If you’re not COMMUNICATING with the people you’re selling to, then you’re missing the boat. I have at least 50% of my traffic from social sites. The thing is, these visitors Already “Know” me because I’m in their community on the social site they hangout in. Conversions rates go through the roof when those visitors come in.
Charles, I’d love to post your article on SocialMediaLandscape.com, with your permission of course.
Adriano Marin
August 21st, 2008 at 9:55 am
141.000 words to say BE NATURAL ON SOCIAL NETWORKS???? You should write content for websites.
Hiram
August 21st, 2008 at 9:57 am
15As someone who’s confused-as-all-get-out about which social marketing platform is better (or worse) than all the others, this series is perfectly timed.
I’ve purchased a couple of Social Marketing ebooks and most of the information out there is basically crap - a thin attempt to force-fit Black Hat SEO techniques to this “new” media. One I have actually suggests that you should have at least 10 accounts at 10 different social media sites. That’s 100 accounts to keep track of!! Who has time for that??
One thing I like about Charles (and why I’ve purchased his products in the past) is that he makes sense.
Hiram
http://www.balance-your-health.com
Marc Meyer
August 21st, 2008 at 10:31 am
16Charles, very timely. I’ve been in heated discussions about this over the last week and a half. To the extent that I have a forthcoming post on this. But here is an angle from the other side http://emersondirect.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/how-does-the-user-measure-roi-in-social-networks/
Its all about engagement and ROI, the chicken or the egg and what are you looking for. Obviously we all want to make money, but perhaps most do not realize that this is not your 1980’s business model of intrusive, in your face marketing. It’s even more than Godin’s permission based marketing.
Marc
D. Saunders
August 21st, 2008 at 10:33 am
17Thank you Charles, for sharing your knowledge. Just getting into the SEO business there is a maze to nagivate and you seem to have a great grasp of the processes. I really enjoy reading your content and always get an educations from it.
Please keep it up, I’ll be reading.
http://www.thesupergreenpages.com
Captain Lou
August 21st, 2008 at 10:37 am
18Great post Charles,
More and more I am bonding with my market via Twitter, Facebook, Ustream & MySpace, etc. More and more, they are purchasing because of Social Media.
Many of my clients have lots more fans (and link love) than I do, and one has even decided to put on an annual:
http://SocialMarketersCruise.com
which came about from just a few tweets on Twitter. A-list marketers who sometimes take days (if at all) to answer an email inquiry…seem to answer in seconds on places like Twitter. Amazing!
“Captain Lou” Edwards
Erika: Technology Goddess
August 21st, 2008 at 10:40 am
19An excellent article, one for the Digg vote. SEO 20/20 members who had the privilege of seeing this video also received a treat. My thoughts are that Crowdsourcing and Social SEO are already as important as traditional SEO and the lines between Market Value and Social Value are finding intimate ways of uniting, such as through membership sites, social networks and communities. Businesses who are not on top of this major global trend run the risk of looking around 2 years from now and wondering what in the world they missed, and why were they left behind in their market?
Caroline T
August 21st, 2008 at 11:00 am
20Posting the article is in itself practising what you’re preaching and that proves the point of what you’re saying in the first place. You’re building trust to an audience of people who all share the same fascination with social networks and adding educational content created by real experience…. and allowing for two way dialogue - posit
Personally what makes social networks different in todays digital landscapes is that is a place where brands try to own people and can’t unless they are being real, sincere and keeping the dialogue going.
Easier said than done as you said at the beginning of your piece - after two years of observation - it does all seem common sense, but then again digital wasn’t meant to be all about rocket science !
I enjoyed reading your opening article and look forward to the following ones and yes it has opened up a debate which is what the whole thing is about ….
Bergholt
August 21st, 2008 at 11:10 am
21Thanks for the article and its conclusions.
Re. statement two, specifically the following passage::
We have evidence that Google is paying attention to the level of “community” and “friendship” and “voting” that occurs within accounts that list your website link.
– would you be able to elaborate that statement — prefereably with some kind of documentation? Is it based on somebody else’s analysis or is it in-house generated knowledge?
I perfectly understand that you might not be able to disclose the source, however, it’d be great knowing a bit more about the nature of the evidence.
Thanks in advance,
Bergholt
Caroline T
August 21st, 2008 at 11:14 am
22I think one sentence dropped off -
two way dialogue - both positive and not!
Anna
August 21st, 2008 at 11:35 am
23Great article, I really liked it. Makes a lot of sense.
There is another thing I would bring up - it is easy to get pulled into a whirlpool where there seem to be so many social networks “that one should be a part of” and so many other Web 2.0 activities one can engage on, I think it can pendulum swing too easily. Would it be better to dabble in 5 networks, or to find one or two that are really fitting and really get involved. Personally I have a Facebook account, for example, but I really don’t have a clue on what to do with it! I don’t really understand Facebook. That’s just an example. Then I read how I should also have this, that, and the other profile. Meanwhile I am barely keeping up with posting on my own blogs …
Anyway, maybe it’s better to spend more time within a few networks than to splatter yourself all over a whole horde of them? That’s my thought.
Caroline T
August 21st, 2008 at 11:57 am
24Ah Anna - should read the plug in Charlies was testing for Word Press ..
Clue its in the story line below this one at the top of the page.
Looks rather good and downloading it for myself.
ROI on Social Media
August 21st, 2008 at 12:01 pm
25[...] Heflin from The Online Social Media Frontier created an interesting post Is there any return on investment in social media? He gives us 10 basic statements to follow when using Social Media for marketing, but what they [...]
Peter Koning
August 21st, 2008 at 12:04 pm
26Hi Charles - great post and I would say the answer to the original question is another question -> “is there any ROI in having relationships?” and the answer is YES. But it can be hard to measure.
As for your statement #5 I think you are lumping all internet marketers together including you and me, and basically saying they don’t know anything, which is stereotyping and uncalled for.
I’d suggest there’s a range of internet marketers from very social media friendly ones to hard core “squeeze page, email blast” types. I think you’re talking about the latter end of the spectrum and surely you’re not talking about IM 2.0 types or some of us who are in the middle using the best of both?
BR,
Peter
Steve @ Acne Treatments
August 21st, 2008 at 12:07 pm
27This report was extremely enlightening. I would have thought that everyone would understand that you need trust in the forums, blogs, etc if you want to succeed. I thought the info you gave about using social networks as a link building system was interesting. When you said that it is not going to work and leave a footprint I am going to have to give this some more thought. thanks. This is a job very well done, keep up the good work.
Steve
Charles
August 21st, 2008 at 3:14 pm
28@Erika - Thank you for stopping by, your comments are always insightful and appreciated.
@Peter Konig - No disrespect meant re: item#5 sorry it came across that way.
@Steve @Caroline T - Thank you
@Anna - You’re right… All the social networks out there are dizzying and you really only need to be involved in a few to be effective.
@Marc Meyer - Thank you for the insightful comment… I will be reading your take shortly after I post this comment.
Marc/Dog Training
August 21st, 2008 at 4:55 pm
29Wow .. talk about timely! I have been thinking recently that with all the internet marketing going on, why has no one quantified exactly how to use … or not use … the social media beyond vague generalizations. Once you get beyond the geewhiz aspects, the reality of which social niche is best, what is a waste of time, and how do you know there is really a ROI become critical questions that I have seen few answers for?
Most approaches have been to throw mud agasint the social wall and see what sticks. Maybe now we are at Web 2.1
I am looking forward to the rest of this series.
Cellfood man
August 21st, 2008 at 5:52 pm
30Social media was originally designed to avoid the hyper-commercialism that existed on the internet at the time of its inception. Do you remember the hundreds of irrelevant and totally obnoxious sites that would come up on just about every search you tried. social media was supposed to give people an opportunity to group together in places where they wouldn;t have to worry about overdone exercises in commercialism.
Alas, this is becoming short-lived as people are finding ways to use social media to entice people to link to their websites and landing pages. ROI is just another effort to measure how to invade the social media spaces. For internet marketers, it is of course essential to learn how to get people to their sales landing pages. I imagine, your report will be quite informative and all your study will lead to new ways to get to social media users.
Thanks for your work.
cellfood man
Cellfood review
10 Social Media Facts You Want to Know
August 21st, 2008 at 6:12 pm
31[...] In other words … How can we produce a positive cash flow by utilizing the seemingly limitless prospect base that is having millions of conversations about millions of things every day? Via Is there any return on investment in social media? [...]
Charles
August 21st, 2008 at 6:36 pm
32We have evidence that Google is paying attention to the level of “community” and “friendship” and “voting” that occurs within accounts that list your website link.
– would you be able to elaborate that statement — prefereably with some kind of documentation? Is it based on somebody else’s analysis or is it in-house generated knowledge?
@Bergholt - I will elaborate on this statement … We do have evidence and I cannot share the evidence that we have shown for our clients but I can share my own. Anticipating this question I began monitoring the phrase “return on investment in social media” immediately after I posted this. Following are points to noto:
1. Indexing on new blog posts usually happens within 5 - 15 minutes on Google (on this blog). We came in at position 40 for the term this morning.
2. At this moment we are holding at position 4
3. I watched the position rise as the content was crowdsourced and linked to from several blogs (thanks to everyone).
This is not an isolated event … I/we have been observing this trend for the past several months. With Google courting Digg for a buyout (and acquiring other social platforms and filing several relevant patents) among other things we see strong evidence that Google is paying attention to user voted content.
All we have is the evidence and we are not the only ones seeing this. This is what I call The New SEO. There was never a focus on SEO yet there is strong SEO benefit to creating good content that is favored by communities… A by product if you will.
New Web 2.0 Platform
August 22nd, 2008 at 2:47 am
33Hi Charles readers n posters … email is social media if you think about it … how many hours a day can you spend sifting through all your favorite email senders mails … after all I can delete an email if I don’t dig the posters subject line! … just like social media I can follow a link in my in-box and get totally lost going from one link to the next then wondering how I got there or from were? …
Just like the email you sent out Charles “As you may know we have been involved in deep research into this very question for a long time. I have devoted the man hours of 9 people plus myself for 2 years to come to the following conclusions:” … it drove me here and Ive read quite a few comments and clicked through the name URL to there sites just like any one would on the social media sites wall …
… Statement 10: You must listen to your target audience to determine their needs before engaging them … SO If you can crack the email code you can crack the social media code thats for sure … as I stated … same same … only communication and filling needs
All my best to you and your wants
Phillip Skinner
Yusuf
August 22nd, 2008 at 3:41 am
34Thanks a lot Charles for this article. Here in India, social networking is yet to popular. Hindi is the main language of this country. Lot of Hindi Blogs are coming but if you think about money, it is next to impossible. I hope scene will change. Please keep on this series live. - http://medianowonline.com/news
Clocking the speed of content indexing by Charles Heflin
August 22nd, 2008 at 10:38 am
35[...] Comments Yusuf on Is there any return on investment in social media?New Web 2.0 Platform on Is there any return on investment in social media?Charles on Is there any [...]
Salihu Ibrahim
August 22nd, 2008 at 5:10 pm
36Thanks charles for this insight into social media. Excellent as always. As an internet marketer I have always been reluctant to use social media as a tool for marketing (So much one can do at a time). I have always suspected that it takes time to build relationship that translate into traffic and eventual cash. Unlike what other “Gurus” will have you think.
Social media is like white hat seo. Takes time but the reward is great when done right.
Looking forward to more
Bergholt
August 23rd, 2008 at 6:18 am
37Hi Charles!
Thanks for the elaboration and the figures. I see you’ve jumped to 2nd position.
The reason I asked for evidence is that I’ve seen numerous campaigns/blog posts/web sites being promoted through a host of social bookmarking services — with great effect, even though users did not vote/buzz/blink up the compaing/post/sites.
On the other hand, I do agree with your general conclusion that Google’s algorithms are paying attention to authentic & virally spreading linking — e.g. people blogging about this post, submitting it to social news sites, etc.
Re. SEO — sure there’s huge potentiel. With RSS feeds and easy syndication & stream aggregation a lot is possible.
/Kasper
Robert Worstell
August 24th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
38Charles (and everyone),
Excellent post. And a very good way to start a conversation about conversations.
Key point is that social media is with a Capital “S”. That’s what it’s for.
I’ll try to keep this pithy:
Statement 1: Social media isn’t for marketing as most people know and practice marketing. The “Cluetrain Manifesto”explains this best for those who want to understand how most people were trained to market - and how they are going to have to change it.
Social media is for socializing. Period. You can’t get into a sales page or landing page from there directly. Like the life insurance salesmen who belong to all sorts of groups - they get prospects and leads, but take their sales “offline” and don’t do it in front of everyone at the group meeting.
I’ve posted this earlier in using “breadcrumbs” to turn social media contacts into sales.
Generally speaking, you don’t get direct sales from social media.
Reason: they are there for the experience. If they were there to buy something, they’d be at an auction site - a community for buyers and sellers.
Social conversationalists (we need a term here - not “socialites”) will look you up if they respect your content, your posts, your comments, your videos. Also depends on volume and frequency as well as contribution to the community - something people want and are looking for.
Statement 2: “Link love” is a dead/dying SEO strategy. Google is moving away from their old algorithms such as pagerank, which is what link love was supposed to influence. It’s dead because it became a spammer tactic. The continuing successful strategy is quality content - which cannot be spammed, because it must be original and creative.
If you want top search engine positions, just submit great content using and about your keyword phrase to several social media - because Google sees that fresh original content is still King.
Statement 3: Someone broke down social networks into three types, which I believe go: a) bookmarking media, b)social media, c)review media. I think there might also be one just for networking, such as LinkedIn - but this is probably just a subset of social media - Facebook itself is used for both. The bookmarking aspect of StumbleUpon is changing over to a network function, so you can find out what other people are finding - not just popularize your own links (as above).
Statement 4: True. The term “edutainment” encompasses all three. Also - tell a story. This is the way people actually think (and change their minds) - by comparing their stories to others. (And why a movie tends to “stick around” in your mind for days - you’re still digesting the story line and character interaction.)
Statement 5: If anyone was ever trained into thinking that you just needed to shout your message a given number of times and it would be accepted, they’ve been grossly mistrained - or are just hacks and spammers. True, 2-3% will buy out of any offer presented, but this simply won’t work in social media - any shouting like that will get you kicked out of that network/media.
The community polices its own. Unlike newspapers and other media which are profit-based, not trust and communication based. Cluetrain Manifesto again.
Statement 6: OK. Manners apply, for instance. Netiquette, and so on.
Statement 7: Sales do not come from social media per se. See the breadcrumbs post above. Your content and persistent contributions gain trust - then they go to check out what you’re all about. You get sales from your other pages, not the social media. (”You don’t get down from an elephant, you get down from a goose.” - old joke repurposed…)
Statement 8: What was known as “traditional SEO” can almost be dropped on its head and forgotten. SEO has evolved and continues to - since it follows search engine evolution. The only standard has been good content. Social media allowed us to spread that content around in more entertaining formats - rather than just text (WWW vs. Usenet.) Current best SEO tactics are page themeing (LSI) and social posts - which brings us back to square one above, high-quality conversations.
The first question any SEO-er should ask: “How can I best serve the Internet community as a whole?” and then, “What can I give others that will improve their experience?” From that you get niche-strategies, as we can’t all be Amazon.com’s. (Long Tail.)
Statement 9: Branding IS trust. It’s not positioning. Leave that to marketing. SEO’s job is to deliver the goods of a) traffic, b) potential leads, c) conversions. ROI is defined in terms of these three, although Conversion is a team effort and beyond simple SEO.
A note here - opt-in traffic from social media has proven to be very fickle and flighty. Opt-in is just as quickly opt-out. People “here for the experience” are not people “here to buy something.” So your target isn’t just volume traffic - you have to get people to buy enough that you can afford those bandwidth spikes.
Statement 10 - You have to actually become a member of that community first. Note that all communities are filled with niches. There is no generic “Tweeter” or “Stumbleuponner” or anything else. Do you homework first - and then join those networks where your particular niche is. But then you must really find out what that niche wants and deliver it. At THAT point, you can work on attracting leads and conversions on your own site.
- - - -
OK, too much ramble - but I hope you’ve all gotten something out of this. Thanks for your patience for reading this far.
Robert
Dave Saunders
August 24th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
39I don’t agree with Robert Worstell’s statement that social media is for socializing only. This is like saying the golf course is only for golf. I can easily attribute direct sales to social media. Not from promoting directly but from engaging and being asked what I do by people who are interested. This is no different than how I’ve gained new business from attending Toastmasters meetings or from a ride up a ski lift. To suggest that socializing and business are somehow in worlds roped off from each other is contrary to thousands of years worth of societal modeling.
But that’s just based on my personal experiences and application.
James Schramko
August 25th, 2008 at 12:01 am
40Social media is often hosted by commercial operators who make money selling ads or data from user generated content.
I don’t agree Social Media is just for socializing.
Charles
August 25th, 2008 at 8:53 am
41@Robert,
Thank you for your excellent contribution to this thread.
Charles
August 25th, 2008 at 8:56 am
42@Dave and @James - There is such thing as social media advertising, I have used Facebook ads as an example. The funny thing about social media is … It IS what we make it to be so there is no single correct answer. Social media can be used for more than just social interaction without question.
Robert Worstell
August 25th, 2008 at 4:49 pm
43Oh, another point - germane to the above. Marketing isn’t just sales. It has a great deal of promotion in it (as well as other actions), as several people have pointed out.
Example: I’ve said that social media can’t be used for marketing (or something to that effect) - better, it is that social media can’t be used for the “whole cycle” of marketing. Meaning, yes - you build trust and get people curious about you and what your company produces, but carrying out the conversion of leads to sales has to take place offline, out of the social media area proper.
Lots of deals may have been forged while on the golf course - but they weren’t playing golf at the time. They were doing a deal, even while leaning on that golf club or talking over mixed drinks at the club. But even then, the paperwork was concluded back at the office.
Social media promotion is completely acceptable - within the rules of that particular social media. Mostly, this is in the form of giving high-quality, valuable content - with a link to your website, blog, or email.
Digg used to be “hell on wheels” in this regard - stuff was voted out of existence and removed. However, it’s become so big that now you can digg your own stuff and it stays there for a long time with no one except the search engines noticing. Other sites are similar.
And you don’t have to be extremely popular to effectively promote your stuff - we are all mostly working on long-tail niches to be successful in online marketing after all.
The point is social media promotion, yes; full-cycle social media marketing, no.
Hope this clarifies…
Michael S. Copeland
August 25th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
44@Robert Worstell
You are right. Social Media gets you the relationship. They get to “know” you. But the real magic happens when you take them from a Social Networking site to your own place. Or hell even pick up the phone or direct email.
I’ve always said it… People buy from People. So use the Social Sites to be social and converse with your targeted market, but let them come to you. Your intention shouldn’t be to make the sale, it should be to genuinely help and bring value to that community.
when that is done, they will come. And when they do, they will be loyal and mostly evangelists!
That’s the formula.
Charles
August 26th, 2008 at 8:03 am
45Thank you Robert,
Your comment adds a great deal of clarification to the overall point of this post.
- Charles
Why does ROI in social media suck? by Charles Heflin
August 26th, 2008 at 9:31 am
46[...] Comments Charles on Is there any return on investment in social media?flyfishingcolorado on Clocking the speed of content indexingRobert Worstell on Is there any return [...]
Sylvia Buetow
August 26th, 2008 at 10:35 am
47This clarified my understanding a little more. I’d like to post a link to this article in my Social Marketing group on Facebook. They may or may not be at a level to understand.
Sylvia Buetow
Clocking the speed of content indexing |
August 27th, 2008 at 2:52 am
48[...] the speed of content indexing, this is nothing but a test. The regularly scheduled series, “ROI in social media” will continue in a moment. For now I want to test the speed at which new content on this [...]
Why does ROI in social media suck? |
August 27th, 2008 at 3:09 am
49[...] series that I am doing on gaining a return on effort and money spent in social media (ROI). In the last post in this series I had made the following statement: The level of success in social media (as [...]
Is social media worth the effort? |
September 7th, 2008 at 1:52 am
50[...] Is there any return on investment in social media? [...]
7 September: PR top 5 | Strive Notes
September 7th, 2008 at 4:54 am
51[...] Ten ways to measure the ROI of social media; Charles Helfin has some really good advice on [...]
Janet
September 16th, 2008 at 4:34 am
52Thanks for the article - I look forward to reading further!
Kathleen Gage
October 25th, 2008 at 7:42 pm
53Excellent information. I have found Social Networking to be a viable resource to build JV relationships, network with peers and build my opt in list by offering information of very high value.
Kathleen Gage
Is social media worth the effort? | LeadMastersUSA
December 28th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
54[...] Is there any return on investment in social media? [...]
Social media as the amplifier « Figure It Out
January 25th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
55[...] media, SEO There are countless debates surrounding social media. Does social media deliver ROI? If so, how do you measure it? Should it even be called social [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: I am testing a Wordpress Plugin for Ping.fm
next post: Clocking the speed of content indexing
to top of page...